My camera recently started adding a huge written brand, advertising "SAMSUNG GALAXY NX, in the lower right of every photo. This has something to do with an especially embedded (and tough to find) sub-menu item known as "your signature". I have no idea however I finally got obviate this "advertisement", since the signature menu doesn't appear to provide a alternative of "no signature", but at least it's gone. I contacted Samsung's support group (online) and they could not resolve the matter, but a day or 2 later the emblem disappeared from my new photos. The KIES software that is enclosed with this camera, is really still filled with bugs, at least when used with Associate in Nursing Apple pc product.
Keith Blodgett clued me in to the truth that this camera's indecipherable screen issue may partly need to do with screen (LCD) brightness. Although no one else has as way as i do know talked regarding this, it is important for anyone shopping for or mistreatment this camera, to understand a way to increase the Galaxy NX's screen brightness. On my camera the brightness was turned by default to a brightness setting below the half approach purpose, and it was useless for outdoor photography! Here's what you would like to grasp to mend this problem: move to the camera's home screen, then choose the "apps" icon (a larger rectangular icon that is composed of sixteen tiny squares) at rock bottom right of your digital display screen. Then choose "Settings", and then choose "My Device" at the highest of that screen. Then choose "Display" and once you get to the show menu, choose "Brightness", which is at the terribly bottom of the show screen! Finally, use your finger to move the "brightness bar" to the proper, toward maximum brightness. For outdoor shooting with any sun at all, you need to regulate this brightness setting near or at the terribly most (all the thanks to the right). WHEW!
So currently I will at least see the screen in bright daylight, with that brightness setting moved all the high, but there is still a honest quantity of glare. However, the LCD screen is then usable, although your battery life can in all probability be considerably reduced, using this setting. As with the new Samsung Galaxy S5 smart phone, there should be a sensor-brightness chip engineered into the camera, to automatically change screen brightness.
The reason i'm increasing my rating to a few stars, is because the digital display readability is not as unhealthy as i believed, as long as you remember to ramp the screen brightness bar up to a terribly high level once you are shooting out of doors. Of course such a vital control should not be hidden half dozen levels down within the menu structure of the camera...screen brightness on a camera like this, that depends so a lot of on readability of the massive digital display screen, should be either mechanically controlled, or there should be a tiny knob or lever on the camera, for adjusting LCD brightness.
But the Kies code that you have to be compelled to use to transfer photos (to a wireless/cellular network, or through the USB cable to your computer) still doesn't work systematically or swimmingly, and the price of this camera remains approach, way too high. Furthermore, as I say below in my original review, using a photographic camera like this to directly send photos to social sites, etc., just does not create a lot of sense to Pine Tree State. Unless you're transmission RAW files (which sensible phones are not capable of dealing with), it makes much a lot of sense to send and receive photos employing a sensible smartphone. And the idea of causation large RAW files over any cellular network makes no sense, either.
In my original review, I stated that the Panasonic FZ-70 ($300 or less currently, here on Amazon) has as good Associate in Nursing intelligence quotient (image quality) as this Samsung Galaxy NX system, but I later altered out that comment. Yesterday I took both cameras to a stunning ecological reserve here in northern Golden State (Table Mountain), and took a couple of hundred photos, using each cameras. In looking at the results, I have to re-affirm that the Panasonic FZ-70's image quality is unquestionably nearly as good as that of the Galaxy NX, plus the Panasonic code (PicBridge) simply hundreds and handles iPhoto files, directly and with no glitches. Addendum on April thirteen, 2014: I took more comparison photos of a terribly attractive, wooded scene here in Paradise, CA, and I carefully compared the Panasonic FZ-70 photos to the Samsung Galaxy NX pictures, and AGAIN, the Samsung image quality was not only no higher than that of the less expensive Panasonic, it seems objectively to Pine Tree State that the Panasonic photos control the edge. What is happening here?
There is no way that I will advocate this Galaxy NX camera, even over the $300 Panasonic FZ-70, in terms of photo quality, versatility, range, and ease of use! after you realize the Galaxy camera is over fourfold as overpriced because the Panasonic, you really ar forced to realize lots of perspective. How Panasonic puts therefore a lot of picture quality/IQ into a camera with such atiny low detector (compared to the massive detector within the Galaxy NX), for $300, is a question i can not answer. However, I know photographic camera price (I've owned near 10 completely different digital cameras over the years) once I see it, and the Panasonic FZ-70 shows tremendous value. Amazon has already dropped the value of this Galaxy NX system by $400, and they've got a protracted, long way to travel before it's fairly priced!